Legal Opinion
Buckingham v. Shoyer
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided January 4, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Garnishment, Interpleader, etc.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward F. Dunne, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams
The only issues of law in this case are between the appellants and the appellee Shoyer. The question is whether the trial court erred in ordering appellants to pay to the clerk of the court for the use of appellee the moneys appellants had received from the garnishees, Marshall Field & Co. and George P. Gore & Co. This was, in effect, a judgment in favor of appellee and against appellants for the sum of. $1,080.80.
The statutory provision in relation to judgment in cases of interpleader is as follows:
“ In all cases where the jury find for a claimant, such claimant shall be entitled to his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Juilliard v. MayIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Carpenter v. McClureSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
- Peck Bros. & Co. v. StrattonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Walton v. Detroit Copper & Brass Rolling MillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pressed Steel Equipment Co. v. Thornburgh Pressteel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1923
- Silberman-Becker Corp. v. HummelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Scheetz v. CrabillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
- Hamilton v. Thayers Eating Houses, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1931