Legal Opinion
Beickert v. G. M. Laboratories, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 24, 1926PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcLaughlin, J.
Action on behalf of an infant, by guardian ad litem, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence.
The infant, whose age at the time of the accident is not disclosed by the record, was burned by the ignition of some scraps or pieces of motion picture films. The facts connected with the burning of these pieces of films are substantially as follows: It is claimed that on the 6th of June, 1921, Peter Beickert, the infant who was injured, with one Tommy O’Brien, aged seven years, went to a vacant lot adjacent to and in the rear of the defendant’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walsh v. Fitchburg RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Perry v. . Rochester Lime Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Travell v. . BannermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Hall v. . New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Beetz v. City of BrooklynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Runkel v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Kingsland v. Erie County Agricultural SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Morse v. Buffalo Tank Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Alston v. Baltimore Fidelity Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.