Legal Opinion

United States v. Dawson

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 3, 2003No. 02 CR 688Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

Defendant Pierre Dawson is charged with attempt and conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance. He has filed five pretrial motions which are granted and denied as follows.

Motion for Immediate Disclosure of Favorable Evidence. Mr. Dawson moves to compel production of any exculpatory evidence the government may have, as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) and Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 92 S.Ct. 763, 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972). In response, the government acknowledges its obligation to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. Robert B. French (90-6222) Jay C. Emerson (90-6407) James W. Caldwell (90-6408) Kenneth L. Foster (90-6477)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Benjamin Valles & Roberto CarreraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Tommie C. BenderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API