Legal Opinion

United States v. Rodriguez-Samano

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 16, 2004No. 03-10708; D.C. No. CR-N-03-136 HDMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Defendant Armando Rodriguez-Samano appeals his sentence, contending that the district court erred in increasing his offense level by eight levels based on its conclusion that defendant’s Arizona conviction for second degree escape constituted a crime of violence, and therefore an aggravated felony, for purposes of the guidelines.

The relevant guideline is U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C), not U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2. For purposes of § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C), an “aggravated felony” is defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43). See U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, cmt. n. 3(A). That definition includes a “crime of violence,” in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Javier Rivera-Sanchez, A/K/A Jose SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Abel Casarez-Bravo, D.C. NoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API