Legal Opinion

Pascoe v. Barlum

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1929No. Docket No. 105, Calendar No. 34,309PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

This bill was filed to restrain the defendants from executing a contract for the pur chase of 100 street cars from the Perley A. Thomas •Car Works for use in the city of Detroit, Michigan. The plaintiff files his bill as a taxpayer. The defendants Barium, Ellis, and Gorman are members of the board of street railway commissioners of the city of Detroit. Mr. Monteith is the city controller, and defendant Mills is the commissioner of the department of purchases and supplies. In August, 1928, Mr. Mills, acting by authority of the street railway board, advertised for bids for the sale of 100 Peter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Attorney General ex rel. Allis-Chalmers Co. v. Public Lighting CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Andrews v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Orion Portfolio Services 2, LLC v. County of Clark Ex Rel. University Medical CenterNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Glen Truck Sales & Service, Inc. v. SirignanoNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. National Engineering & Contracting Co. v. Cleveland (City)Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1957
  4. Lasky v. City of Bad AxeMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Taylor v. County Board of Arlington CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API