Legal Opinion

Geoffrey Fieger v. Carl Gromek

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 20, 2010No. 07-2342UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal represents trial attorney Geoffrey N. Fieger’s latest attempt to involve the federal courts in his long-running dispute with several justices of the Michigan Supreme Court. 1 See, e.g., Fieger v. Mich. Supreme Court, 553 F.3d 955 (6th Cir.2009); Fieger v. Ferry, 471 F.3d 637 (6th Cir.2006); Gilbert v. Ferry, 413 F.3d 578 (6th Cir.2005). In his second trip to our court in the present case, Fieger argues that the district court improperly dismissed his suit by misconstruing our prior mandate and finding that Fieger’s as-applied challenge to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Get Back Up, Inc. v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API