Legal Opinion

Reed v. Reed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 28, 1921PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Charles Reed, from a judgment Of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in " the office of the clerk of the county of Albany on the 10th day of February, 1919, dismissing the complaint on a motion made upon the pleadings at the opening of the trial, on the ground that the same did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

1Opinion of the Court

H. T. Kellogg, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to a complaint. The complaint is very brief. It alleges that the parties to the action were married on the 11th day of November, 1914; that at the time of the marriage the defendant was a lunatic; that defendant has continued ever since to be insane; that she is now confined in a State hospital for the insane; that the parties have not lived together since the 18th of December, 1914; that there were no issue of the marriage. It is not alleged that ■ the plaintiff was ignorant of the lunacy of the defendant at the time…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hoadley v. HoadleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Presbrey v. PresbreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  3. Sleicher v. SleicherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  4. Gilels v. GilelsNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Marvis v. MarvisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API