Legal Opinion

Brinderson-Newberg Joint Venture v. Pacific Erectors, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided July 19, 1988No. CV87-7448-PAR, CV-88-1282-PARPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

RYMER, District Judge.

The parties to this dispute are Pacific Erectors, Inc., and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company (the “subcontractor”) on one side, and Brinderson-Newberg Joint Venture, Brinderson Corporation, Brinderson Constructors, Inc., Gust K. Newberg Corporation, and Frank Loscavio (the “contractor”) on the other. The various claims and counter-claims essentially arise from a dispute over the amount of work and type of work that the subcontractor agreed to perform for the contractor in a project for the Navy at the Puget Sound Naval…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. William Rodger Starnes v. Honorable Matthew F. McGuire Arthur Everett Small, Jr. v. Honorable George L. Hart, JrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  5. Plum Tree, Inc. v. StockmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1988
  2. State v. GarySupreme Court of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API