Legal Opinion

Tritt v. Cortes

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge McGINLEY.

Before this Court, in our original jurisdiction, are the preliminary objections of the Honorable Pedro A. Cortes, Secretary of the Commonwealth (Secretary) to the petition for review filed by Connie J. Tritt (Ms. Tritt). This Court sustains the preliminary objection based on Ms. Tritt’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

On June 24, 2003, Ms. Tritt filed in this Court a petition for declaratory judgment and writ of mandamus, treated as a petition for review. Ms. Tritt alleges:

COUNT I

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

5. The Secretary discharges his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Winslow-Quattlebaum v. Maryland Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Hamilton v. Unionville-Chadds Ford School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tritt v. CortesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Smith v. CortesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Tritt v. CortesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API