Duncomb v. State

The appellants and another were charged by information with the crime of robbery. Appellants were found guilty by a jury and *87were so adjudged by the court. They filed separate appeals. We permitted joint use of the record, and the appeals were argued together.

Appellant Duncomb challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, and contends the trial court erred by limiting certain attempted cross-examination. Appellant Howard raises the latter contention, and further argues that conflict in the testimony of two state witnesses with relation to a matter operated to cancel out the testimony of each…