Legal Opinion

Anaheim Gardens v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 8, 2022No. 93-655Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 93-655C (E-Filed: April 8, 2022) ) ANAHEIM GARDENS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(1); v. ) Standing; Limited Partnership; Legal ) Existence. THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Harry J. Kelly, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs. Shari A. Rose, Senior Trial Counsel, with whom were Brian M. Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Acting Director, Franklin E. White, Jr., Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API