Legal Opinion

Conner v. Pittsburg Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1907No. Appeals, Nos. 133 and 134PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeals, Nos. 133 and 134, Oct. T., 1906, by defendant, from judgment of O. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Aug. T., 1904, No. 541, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Joseph Conner, Minor, by next friend, Burton Conner, and Burton Conner in his own right v. Pittsburg Railways Company. Trespass to recover damages for injuries to a boy seven years old. Before McClung, J. The circumstances of the accident are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Read the full summary

Appeals, Nos. 133 and 134, Oct. T., 1906, by defendant, from judgment of O. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Aug. T., 1904, No. 541, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Joseph Conner, Minor, by next friend, Burton Conner, and Burton Conner in his own right v. Pittsburg Railways Company. Trespass to recover damages for injuries to a boy seven years old. Before McClung, J. The circumstances of the accident are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Verdict and judgment for Burton Conner for $1,500, and for Joseph Conner for $4,500. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was in refusing binding…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Mestrezat,

The first and only assignment which requires consideration alleges that the court erred in not affirming the defendant’s point for instruction that there ivas no sufficient evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant company to justify a verdict for the plaintiffs. This point was properly refused by the court, and the case was submitted to-the jury.

The duty of a motorman requires him to exercise care and vigilance in operating his car. He should give close attention to his duties so that he may protect those who without negligence are occupying the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schnur v. Citizens' Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Keller v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tatarewicz v. United Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Goldberg v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Quattrochi v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Distasio v. United Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Parrotta v. Pennsylvania & Mahoning Valley Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API