First National Bank of Leoti v. Fisher
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Wiohita District Court. Injunction to restrain the collection of a certain tax. Judgment for the defendants, at the June term, 1890. The plaintiff Banh brings the case to this court. The opinion states the material facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The First National Bank of Leoti commenced this action to restrain the collection of certain taxes assessed against it. An order, temporarily restraining the treasurer and sheriff from levying and collecting the same from the property of the bank, was granted. The defendants demurred to the plaintiff’s petition, upon the ground that there was a defect of parties defendant; that the petition did not state facts sufficient to grant the relief prayed for, and that it did not state a cause of action against the defendants. *727Tbe court sustained…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Van Allen v. AssessorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- People v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Evansville Bank v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Voran v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Spokane & Eastern Trust Co. v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Voran v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Eureka Building & Loan Ass'n v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Stapylton v. ThaggardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.