Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 9, 1990No. 89-2171PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the-board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 5-103(A), 5-107(A)(l), and 1-102(A)(5). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Rancman v. Interim Settlement Funding Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
- Allen County Bar Ass'n v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Toledo Bar Assn. v. PheilsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Allen Cty. Bar Assn. v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Grange Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019