Legal Opinion
Sweet v. Perkins
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 14, 1906Published
Action by Oscar H. Sweet against Charles H. Perkins and others.
1Per curiam
Order denying motion for new trial on the ground of fraud and deceit practiced by plaintiff at the trial affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See 101 N. Y. Supp. 163.
McLennan, P. j., and NASH, J., dissent.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sweet v. PerkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906