Legal Opinion

Coe v. Diener

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 3, 1964No. 4221PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

159 So.2d 269 (1964)

Constance Derna COE, Appellant,

v.

Christine DIENER, Individually, and for the use and benefit of Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Appellee.

No. 4221.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

January 3, 1964.

John A. Thabes, Saunders, Curtis, Ginestra & Gore, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Davis W. Duke, Jr., McCune, Hiaasen, Crum & Ferris, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

WHITE Judge.

Defendant Constance Derna Coe seeks reversal of an order denying her motion to dismiss the complaint of Christine Diener. The appealed order sustained the sufficiency of the complaint of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. Willys-Overland, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Trenton Street Railway Co. v. LawlorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  3. Headley v. LeavittSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  4. Cook v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  5. Elmer v. Trenton Trust & Safe Deposit Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Lotspeich Co. v. Neogard Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Bursten v. GreenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. ManceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. The Florida Bar v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API