Legal Opinion

Camacho v. Camacho

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 28, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in awarding plaintiff maintenance of $150 per week for 12 years or until plaintiff begins receiving Social Security benefits, whichever shall occur first (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [a]; Loeb v Loeb, 186 AD2d 174, 175).

The record does not support defendant’s contention that the Referee failed to take into account the tax consequences to each party upon the distribution of marital assets (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [d] [10]).

Finally, defendant contends that it was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loeb v. LoebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Marine Midland Bank v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API