Legal Opinion

Bates v. McClees

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 4, 1948No. Civ. A. No. 7745PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGRANERY, District Judge.

This is a suit for triple damages under the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq., and the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1881 et seq. The complaint alleged that defendant Hilda Mc-Clees charged plaintiffs over the legal maximum rent for the four apartments they occupied. Various defenses were asserted; plaintiff moved for summary judgment and judgment was granted by this Court, D.C., 76 F.Supp. 939, as to those claims which arose within year before the commencement of the action. However, the issue…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bates v. McCleesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Torres v. BlanesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951
  2. Torres v. Luisa BlanesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API