Farber v. Strickler
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Dissent · McGRAWMcGRAW, Justice
Fundamental disagreement with the majority in this case1 compels my dissent. *329From the tone of the majority opinion, proper courtroom behavior is portrayed as but a one-way street. Our Judicial Code of Ethics, however, indicates otherwise. Canon 3A(3) of the Judicial Code of Ethics expressly provides, “A judge should be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom he deals in his official capacity.” Furthermore, as the commentary to this canon observes, “The duty to hear all proceedings fairly and with patience is not inconsistent with the…
Also in this document: Dissent · McHugh.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. CraftWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. T.C.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. StoneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- Gallagher v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. FarberWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991