Legal Opinion

Wilmington Trust, NA v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided April 21, 2020No. 2:16-cv-02713Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 WILMINGTON TRUST, N.A., ) 4 ) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 2:16-cv-02713-GMN-EJY 5 vs. ) ) ORDER 6 SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, et al., ) 7 ) Defendants. ) 8 ) 9 Pending before the Court is Defendant/Cross-Claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC’s 10 (“SFR’s”) unopposed Motion for Default Judgment as to Cross-Defendant Citibank, N.A. 11 (“Citibank”), (ECF No. 74). Also pending before the Court is SFR’s unopposed Motion for 12 Default Judgment as to Cross-Defendant Raymond A. Schep (“Schep”), (ECF No. 75). For the 13 reasons discussed below, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  3. Matao C. Yokeno v. Ramon C. MafnasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Chapman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. CaridiDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API