Legal Opinion

Norton v. Woods

New York Court of Chancery

Decided April 21, 1835PublishedCited by 17 opinions

This was an application to dissolve an injunction which restrained the defendants from proceeding to collect a judgment recovered in the supreme court. W. Woods, one of the present defendants, had been a copartner with A. Bishop and H. Sulkley, and afterwards purchased out their interest, and took an assignment of all the partnership property and effects, and. agreed to pay all the debts of the firm.

Read the full summary

This was an application to dissolve an injunction which restrained the defendants from proceeding to collect a judgment recovered in the supreme court. W. Woods, one of the present defendants, had been a copartner with A. Bishop and H. Sulkley, and afterwards purchased out their interest, and took an assignment of all the partnership property and effects, and. agreed to pay all the debts of the firm. He after-wards brought a suit against Norton, in the name of himself and his former copartners, for the recovery of a demand alleged to have been due to the firm at the time of the assignment.…

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The facts upon which this injunction rests are positively sworn to in the bill, as matters within the complainant’s own knowledge. .But the defendants could only deny them upon their information and belief, not being matters within their personal knowledge. So far, therefore, as the dissolution of the injunction depends upon the answer of the defendants, the equity of the bill is not sufficiently denied ; and the injunction should be retained until the hearing, to enable the complainant to substantiate these positive allegations of his bill by proof. It becomes necessary, then,…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Schroeppell v. . ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Pack v. . the Mayor, C. of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  3. Norton v. WoodsCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
  4. Williams v. Mitchell's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  5. Fitch v. BatesNew York Supreme Court · 1851

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API