Brooks-Hamilton v. City of Oakland (In Re Brooks-Hamilton)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
LESLIE TCHAIKOVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.
The motion of defendant/cross-complainant Tevis Thompson, Jr. (the “Trustee”), seeking summary judgment on the claims asserted against him in the complaint filed in the above-captioned adversary proceeding and on his cross-claims against the plaintiff/cross-defendant Ralbert Brooks-Hamilton (the “Debtor”) and others came on for hearing before the above-captioned Court on July 20, 2006. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court took the motions under submission. The Court’s decision and the basis for that decision are set forth below.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- In Re: Russell Schwartz Linda Schwartz, Debtors. Russell Schwartz Linda Schwartz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- General Conference Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists v. Seventh-Day Adventist Congregational Church John R. MarikCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- In Re Laurence A. NEUTON; Esther Neuton, Debtors. Laurence A. NEUTON, Appellant, v. Curtis B. DANNING, Trustee, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Stephen C. HemmenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cutter v. Seror (In Re Cutter)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Rosen v. Dahan (In Re Minh Vu Hoang)District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- In re: Christine SkandisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2022