Legal Opinion

Harper v. Harper

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice TomliNsou

Some months since, this Court dismissed without prejudice the petition for certiorari filed by landowners, Harpers and Stockton, and denied a petition to rehear. The two memos, in these actions were written for the Court by Justice G-ailor. Hue to the confusion which resulted from his unexpected death soon thereafter, this Court was not aware until quite recently that he had given petitioners for certiorari permission to file a second petition to rehear. These facts are stated in explanation of our delay in acting upon this second petition. A brief résumé of the situation presented by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tennessee Central Railroad v. CampbellTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Cunningham v. Memphis Railroad Terminal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Cockrill v. Peoples Savings BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Mengle Box Co. v. Lauderdale CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Payne v. SatterfieldTennessee Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harper v. Trenton Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  2. Knox County v. BurroughsTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Mary Hall v. Mary Rose PippinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  4. Shelby County v. ArmourCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
  5. South Dakota Department of Transportation v. FreemanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API