Anderson v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Judge.
Movant appeals after the trial court granted the state’s motion to dismiss his second Rule 27.26 motion. We affirm.
The first Rule 27.26 motion was filed by movant on January 7, 1982. It was denied after an evidentiary hearing. We affirmed. Anderson v. State, 647 S.W.2d 883 (Mo.App.1983).
Movant filed the present motion on February 3, 1987. He claimed the state had failed to abide by the plea agreements in causes 395976 and 396485. Counsel was appointed to represent movant. The state moved to dismiss the motion because mov-ant had filed a Rule 27.26 motion in 1982 which was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Lewis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Giles v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Huston v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Phillips v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by1 opinion
- Etenburn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012