Legal Opinion

Davis v. Waycross Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 8, 1939No. 27491PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

Where two defendants, one of whom is a resident of the county in which the suit is filed, and the other is a non-resident of tbe county, are sued jointly as tort-feasors, the court has jurisdiction of both defendants, including jurisdiction over the non-resident defendant, if both of them aré in fact joint tort-feasors or joint obligors. Code, § 2-4304. If, however, there is no liability against the resident defendant, he is necessarily not a joint tort-feasor or joint obligor with the non-resident defendant, and the court, as respects the person of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Warren v. RushingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Saffold v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Southeastern Truck Lines, Inc. v. RannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  2. Brooks v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Steding Pile Driving Corp. v. John H. Cunningham & AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Morris v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Southern Nitrogen Co. v. ManuelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API