Legal Opinion

McGraw-Hill, Inc. v. State Tax Commission

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice T. Paul Kane (146 AD2d 371), with costs. On this appeal the State contends, for the first time, that even if the taxpayer prevails in its claim that the tax levied on it for tax years 1976 through 1979 is unconstitutional, the court’s decision, based upon a 1978 amendment to the Commission’s rules and a 1981 statutory amendment (L 1981, ch 103, § 1, amending Tax Law § 210 [3] [a] [2] [B]), should not be applied retroactively because the methodology for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Condé Nast Publications, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. McGraw-Hill, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sharp v. Caterpillar, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  2. Citizens For An Orderly Energy Policy, Inc. v. CuomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Christopher v. PhillipsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Reuters America, Inc. v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Puterio v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API