Legal Opinion

Clinton County v. Francis

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1976No. Docket Nos. 26478-26481PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

These four actions were consolidated below. At issue was the availability of the tax exemption found in 1953 PA 189, as amended, MCLA 211.181; MSA 7.7(5). The court disallowed the claim of exemption made by plaintiffs Aero Realty and Radway and defendants Bigelow and Francis, all lessees at Capital City Airport. The lessees appeal.

1953 PA 189 authorized the taxation of lessees and users of property otherwise tax-exempt. Rockwell Spring & Axle Co v Romulus Twp, 365 Mich 632; 114 NW2d 166 (1962). Not all lessees or users of tax-exempt property are subject to taxation; the statute exempts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. TygardMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  2. County of Kent v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Rockwell Spring & Axle Co. v. Romulus TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc. v. City of RomulusMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Skybolt Partnership v. City of FlintMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Air Flite & Serv-A-Plane v. Tittabawassee TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1983
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API