Legal Opinion
Clarke v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 31, 1951No. Civ. A. 2834-51PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*589PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is a civil action brought by plaintiffs, to whom we shall refer as “Clarke” and “Atwood”, respectively, seeking to have an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission enjoined and then vacated and -set aside. . Richmond-Greyhound Lines, Inc., which we shall call “Greyhound”, intervened in the trial court. The order which is the subject matter of the suit was entered by the Commission February 5, 1951, and granted to Greyhound a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing operation, as a common carrier by motor vehicle of passengers, over a certain…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Federal Communications Commission v. Sanders Bros. Radio StationSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- McLean Trucking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- ICC v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Trans-American Van Service, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1976
- Assure Competitive Transportation, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Southern Kansas Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
- Robbins v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.