Legal Opinion

Wooters v. Wooters

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 3, 1997No. 95-P-346PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At the time of the divorce, both parties were fifty-two years old, had an upper middle class station, and had been married for twenty-nine years. The husband was a partner in a large law firm and the wife, a high school graduate, was unemployed. She had worked as a bank teller prior to and during the first year of their marriage, but after she became pregnant with the parties’ first child, did not work outside the home. The children are now grown. The judge made the requisite findings taking into account all of the appropriate factors under G. L. c. 208, § 34.

The husband complains that he did…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kunkle v. KunkleOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Drapek v. DrapekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Chaker v. ChakerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. Delozier v. DelozierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  5. In Re Marriage of ParelloAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Freedman v. FreedmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  2. Braun v. BraunMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. Hassey v. HasseyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  4. Ross v. RossMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  5. Wooters v. WootersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API