Legal Opinion

Hahamovitch v. Hahamovitch

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 8, 2014No. 4D10-1077PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We reverse the order on appeal to the extent that it awarded the wife attorney’s fees for the travel time of her counsel. See Mandel v. Decorator’s Mart, Inc. of Deerfield Beach, 965 So.2d 311, 315 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (“[W]ithout proof that a competent local attorney could not be obtained, an award of attorney’s fees from an opponent should not include travel time over and above what a local attorney would charge.”); Belmont v. Belmont, 761 So.2d 406, 407 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (reversing fees in a dissolution case for the time the wife’s Polk County counsel spent traveling to and from Sarasota…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Belmont v. BelmontDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Chandler v. ChandlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  3. Payne v. PayneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Bohner v. BohnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Globe Contracting v. HourCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API