Middaugh v. Waseca Canning Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
After verdict, defendant, on a settled case, moved for judgment notwithstanding. The motion was denied, and defendant appeals from the judgment rendered in plaintiff’s favor for $1,668.89.
The only assignments of error are: (a) The court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a directed verdict; (b) the court erred in denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The only question raised is whether the record justifies a recovery, and that depends upon the sufficiency of' the proof of defendant’s negligence as the cause of the death of plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Osborne v. McMastersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Twist v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Gimmestad v. Rose Brothers Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Eckhardt v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Rosse v. St. Paul & Duluth Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nolley v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Smith v. Otto Hendrickson Post 212, American LegionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Davies v. Land O' Lakes Racing Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Peterson Ex Rel. Peterson v. Richfield Plaza, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Weber v. Saint Anthony Falls Water Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.