Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Indianapolis Coal Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1913No. 7,859PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From Superior Court of Marion County (80,383); Charles J. Orbison, Judge Pro Tem. Action by the Indianapolis Coal Company against Arthur Jordan. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLairy, J.

1. Appellee filed its complaint in the trial court and recovered a judgment against appellant for the value of a carload of crushed stone, alleged to have been delivered by it to appellant at his special instance and request. Appellant did not challenge the sufficiency of the complaint in the trial court by demurrer or otherwise; but its sufficiency is questioned for the first time by an assignment of errors. When so presented the objections urged against this complaint are unavailable. The complaint is sufficient to bar another action for the same cause. *544Town of Knightstown v. Homer (1905),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lillie v. TrentmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Perry v. PernetIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Lewis v. AlbertsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Crawford v. LawrenceIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Chamness v. ChamnessIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Survance v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Floyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Gordy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Sullivan v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Morrow, Inc. v. MUNSONIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API