Legal Opinion
Nolen v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 11, 1915No. 4419PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error from District Court, Blaine County; James R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by the State against H. D. Nolen and others on a forfeited bail bond. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MATHEWS, C.
1. This, is an action upon a forfeited bail bond filed in the district court of Blaine county, the petition being as follows:.
“Petition.
“Now comes the state of Oklahoma, by and through the county attorney of Blaine county, and for its cause of action against each and all of the defendants says:
“That on the 23d day of February, 1909, the county attorney filed in the county court of Blaine county a complaint, charging the defendant, H. D. Nolen, with unlawfully soliciting Pete Nicholson to purchase intoxicating liquor; the same being case No. 1417, a true, full, complete,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Checotah Hardware Co. v. HensleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Long v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beltran v. RollArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- McCoy v. MayoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- City of Lawton v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915