Succession of Horrell
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TERRI F. LOVE, Judge.
|; This appeal arises from protracted litigation surrounding a succession. The plaintiff filed a motion to fix compensation and expenses, which the trial court granted and awarded the plaintiff $10,000. The plaintiff alleges that the trial court is biased against him and should have awarded him more money. We find that the trial court did not err in awarding $10,000 and affirm.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Walter Horrell, his siblings, and Lisa Matthews, the current provisional adminis-tratrix, have been involved in protracted litigation regarding Edward…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Borden-Aicklen Auto Supply Co. v. Folse Service StationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Cole v. MurrayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Succession of HorrellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re DeanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Walter J. Horrell v. Jack Marks AlltmontLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020