Legal Opinion
Anthony B. v. Priscilla B.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 25, 2011PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The court’s decision was not an improvident exercise of discretion (see e.g. Matter of Hissam v Mancini, 80 AD3d 802, 803 [2011], lv dismissed and denied 16 NY3d 870 [2011]). Even though the court did not explicitly discuss all the factors listed in Domestic Relations Law § 76-f (2), the record is sufficient to permit us to consider them (see e.g. Matter of Sutton v Sutton, 74 AD3d 1838, 1839 [2010]).
We note that a decision regarding inconvenient forum depends on the specific issue(s) to be decided in the pending litigation (see Matter of Jenkins v Jenkins, 9 AD3d 633, 636 [2004], lvs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hissam v. ManciniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Sutton v. SuttonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Jenkins v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by9 opinions
- Frank MM. v. Lorain NN.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Snow v. ElmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- McAvoy v. HanniganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Luis F.F. v. Jessica G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Frank MM. v. Lorain NN.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.