Legal Opinion

Hotaling v. A. B. Leach & Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 16, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBogenshutz, J.

This is an action to recover $980 for fraud and deceit inducing plaintiff to purchase a $1,000 bond of the National Oil Company, a New Jersey corporation. The nature of plaintiff’s cause of action is indorsed on the summons: “ For damages for fraud and deceit on the sale of ‘ One First Lien Seven per cent. Serial Gold Bond of the National Oil Company of New Jersey.’ ” The bill of particulars contains allegations charging defendants with having induced him to buy the bond by fraudulent representations made orally by a bond salesman and issuance of a printed circular in the form of a…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Kountze v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Morris v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Hayward v. LessonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. von Au v. MagenheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Ins. Co. of Iowa v. Halsey, Stuart & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  2. Lippman Packing Corp. v. RoseCity of New York Municipal Court · 1953
  3. Singleton v. HarrimanNew York Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API