Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nelson v. Denny

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1901No. 3990Published

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. William Hicicman Moobe, Judge.

1Dissent

Fullerton, J.,

(dissenting). — I am unable to agree with the conclusion reached by the court in this case. If I read the opinion aright,- it holds that an order vacating and setting aside a judgment can, under no circumstances or conditions, be reviewed upon a direct appeal from the •order, no matter what the effect of such order may he upon the rights of the parties to the judgment. This, in my opinion, violates not only the plain provisions of the statute, hut goes beyond any decision of this court rendered since the present appeal statute went into effect, and is directly contrary to its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Marston v. HumesWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. McCord v. McCordWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Chezum v. ClaypoolWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Deming Investment Co. v. ElyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Freeman v. AmbroseWashington Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API