Harden v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
This appellant was indicted for rape. The alleged injured party was Florria Harden, who the evidence disclosed was his own daughter, a girl about the age of 16 years, and upon her evidence the state relied for a conviction.
Upon conviction for rape the law makes it the express and sole duty of the jury, in its discretion, to fix the punishment, Code 1923, § 5407; and in charging the jury in this case the learned trial judge correctly stated the law in this connection.
The jury, however, disregarded the court's instructions and returned into court the following verdict, to wit: "We, the jury,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Spooney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Cobia v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
- Douglass v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- Stinson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Waller v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947