Hancock v. Aiken Mills, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentJustice Carter
(dissenting) : Not being able to agree with the conclusion reached in the leading opinion in this case, I most respectfully dissent, and will briefly state my reasons therefor.
I agree with the general propositions of law stated by the writer of the opinion, and, of course, do not question but concede the correctness of the testimony quoted. However, I am unable to agree with the inference to be drawn therefrom with regard to whether or not the fire in question was an attractive nuisance, in the sense alleged in the complaint, and whether it resulted in the injury complained of as a result of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arkansas Valley Trust Co. v. McIlroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Keistler Co. v. Aetna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Stone v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- Haithcock v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
- Grayhek v. SternAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910