Legal Opinion

(HC) Lam v. Thompson

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 23, 2023No. 2:21-cv-01835Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TUAN LAM, No. 2:21-cv-1835 TLN AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 PAUL THOMPSON, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 Before the court is respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition. ECF No. 7. Petitioner has 21 filed a reply. ECF…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Connecticut Board of Pardons v. DumschatSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Trevor A. Laing v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API