Legal Opinion

Riemer v. Riemer

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.

This is an action for a separation and for rescission of a separation agreement. The plaintiff wife moves to reargue a prior motion and the defendant husband cross-moves to strike the third and fourth causes of action to rescind the agreement.

The husband contends that inasmuch as the wife has lately instituted an action to recover moneys as necessaries or, in the alternative, under the terms of the separation agreement, she has thereby ratified the agreement and consequently that the prior actions instituted by her herein for a separation and to rescind must be dismissed.

In actions to rescind…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Tirrell v. . TirrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Haas v. HaasNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Hendricks v. . IsaacsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Pomerance v. PomeranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Christian v. ChristianNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. McCrensky v. SchweitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API