Legal Opinion

Dearien v. Union Carbide Corporation

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided March 9, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00285Unknown

1Opinion

FOR TINH TEH SEO UUTNHITEERDN S DTIASTTERSI CDTI SOTFR WICETS CTO VUIRRGT INIA CHARLESTON DIVISION CHRISTINA L. DEARIEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00285 UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. ORDER Before this Court is the motion filed by Plaintiffs Christina L. Dearien and Thomas G. Dearien (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) to compel Defendant Union Carbide Corporation (“UCC”) to provide complete responses to their discovery requests. (ECF No. 78.) Plaintiffs identify four claimed deficiencies with UCC’s discovery responses. (Id. at 10– 17.) Specifically, they argue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frontier-Kemper Constructors, Inc. v. Elk Run Coal Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2007
  2. Vica Coal Co. v. CrosbyDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2003
  3. Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. Elk Run Coal Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API