Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23936e
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
107 F.3d 877
Pens. Plan Guide (CCH) P 23936E
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Thomas COSGROVE, husband, on his own behalf and on behalf of
all others similarly situated; Matilda June Cosgrove, wife,
on her own and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CIRCLE K CORPORATION, a Texas corporation; Circle K
Convenience Stores, Inc., a Texas…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Williams v. Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Moreno Roofing Company, Inc. v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ruggeri v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008
- Mullin v. OrthweinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- In Re CraddockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Montgomery v. Aetna Plywood, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Defazio v. Hollister, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.