Legal Opinion

United States v. Chisholm

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 5, 1981No. ACM 22841PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MILLER, Judge:

A military wholesaler introduced drugs on to a base for the express purpose of selling thém to several drug dealers assigned to that base. The question presented here is whether the offense of on-base possession of such a drug cache is multiplicious for sentencing purposes with the offense of transferring a single portion of it. We hold that it is not, and affirm.

The trial below was before military judge alone. The accused pleaded guilty to two specifications in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934: one, alleged transfer of some…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. TrottierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  3. United States v. PosnickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. DicarioUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. JeffersonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. WordenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. AnsleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. ClarkeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API