Legal Opinion

United States v. 760.807 Acres of Land

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 1, 1984No. 83-1991PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

In September 1980, the United States brought this condemnation action to acquire an “Explosive Safety Hazard Zone” (ESHZ) around wharves used to load and unload explosives. Appellants, the Trustees under the Will and of the Estate of James Campbell, Deceased (“Trustees of the Campbell Estate”), held title to most of the acquired land. After a separate trial involving only Campbell Estate land, a jury awarded the Trustees $14,500,000. The Trustees appeal, contending that the amount of the compensation was inadequate. We affirm.

I. Background

In Hawaii, all loading and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. 564.54 Acres of Monroe and Pike County LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Baetjer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. 33.5 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. 87.98 Acres of Land More or LessCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Bassett, New Mexico LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C. v. DecoulosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. Juliano v. Montgomery-Otsego-Schoharie Solid Waste Management AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API