Legal Opinion

Dean v. John B. Pike & Son, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without *943costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term erred in refusing to grant summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs claim for interest in excess of the statutory rate. The court has the discretionary power to fix the rate of interest only where equitable relief is sought (CPLR 5001 [a]; Bosco v Alicino, 37 AD2d 552). In this case, plaintiff claimed that he and defendant John B. Pike & Son were engaged in a joint venture and, as a result, that he was entitled to equitable relief in the nature…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kaminsky v. KahnNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Bosco v. AlicinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davenport v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API