Legal Opinion

Hall v. City of Wichita

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1924No. 25,119PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*657The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The action was one on contract for services. The plaintiff prevailed and defendant appeals.

In January, 1921, L. W. Clapp, then city manager of Wichita, employed plaintiff as police woman at an agreed salary of $150 per month. It was the understanding of both the plaintiff and Mr. Clapp that the employment should last for a period of one year. At the time of the employment, however, Mr. Clapp informed Mrs. Hall that a new board of commissioners would be elected in April, 1921, but that, if her services were satisfactory, she would probably…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wichita Water Co. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Town of Tempe v. CorbellArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Haney v. CofranSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. Haney v. CofranSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. John E. Kirchner v. The Kansas Turnpike AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  2. Ney v. City of Hoisington, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
  3. Warren v. City of Junction City, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001
  4. City of North Newton v. RegierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API