Cibula Ex Rel. J.A.C. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY and Judge DUNCAN joined.
OPINION
DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge:
This Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) case returns to us after remand to the district court. See Cibula v. United States, 551 F.3d 316, 317 (4th Cir.2009) (Cibula I).
The FTCA waives the federal Government’s sovereign immunity in tort actions, making the United States liable “in the same manner and to the same extent as a private individual under like circum stances.” 28 U.S.C. § 2674. Courts determine the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Doe v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Hull v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Starns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Cibula v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Clarence Lee, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Marla Dixon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Stathis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Dirk Askew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.