Legal Opinion

Conron v. Hoerr

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 10, 1901No. Nos. 12,506 — (42)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of tbe municipal court of Mankato, Shissler, J.

1Opinion of the CourtLoyeuy, J.

This was an action to recover for money had and received to the use of plaintiffs. Defendant shipped poultry to plaintiffs in New York, and drew a sight draft on the consignees for the value of the same, which was honored and paid. The poultry, when it reached New York, was damaged. Plaintiffs sold the same for the best price obtainable (which amounted to $31.22 less than the amount of the draft), and then brought suit in the municipal court of Mankato to recover the overpaid balance on the draft, and recovered a verdict therefor. Judgment was entered on the verdict, upon which defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Duncan v. EverittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Flibotte v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Youngquist v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API