Legal Opinion
Angelle v. Louisiana State Racing Commission
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 25, 2002No. Nos. 2002-CA-0610, 2002-CA-0611PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
h Chief Judge WILLIAM H. BYRNES III.
The plaintiffs, Dale Angelle and Arlene Laws, appeal the trial court’s affirmance of the Racing Commission’s judgment finding that the plaintiffs violated the racing rules which prohibit the giving of “milkshakes”, i.e. sodium bicarbonate 1, to their horses prior to racing.
In February of 2000, the Stewards of the Fair Grounds ruled that “Rare Money,” a thoroughbred horse trained by plaintiff-appellant, Dale Angelle, which won the fifth race held on February 7, 2000, had excessive levels of carbon dioxide After the race, Rare Money tested,
“... Positive for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Star Ent. v. State Through Dept. of Rev.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Dorignac v. LOUISIANA STATE RACING COM'NLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Doe v. LA. STATE BD. OF MEDICAL EXAMINERSLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- ADMINISTRATORS TULANE ED. FUND v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bourgeois v. Louisiana State Racing CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Cathey v. Louisiana State Racing CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Thomas v. Ohio State Racing Comm., 08ap-459 (12-31-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008